Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment1_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Point range: 90–100 Good Point range: 80–89 Fair Point range: 70–79 Poor Point range: 0–69
In 3 or 4 sentences, explain the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. Which drugs are contraindicated, if any, and why. Be specific. What it is the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms? Points: Points Range: 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response accurately and clearly details which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response accurately identifies which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples. The response accurately explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate or vague examples. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate examples, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms, or is missing. Feedback:
List four predictors of late onset generalized anxiety disorder. Points: Points Range: 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder, or is missing. Feedback:
List four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Points: Points Range: 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Feedback:
An episode of major depression is defined as a period of time lasting at least 2 weeks. List at least five symptoms required for the episode to occur. Be specific. Points: Points Range: 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided fully support the response. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided support the response. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur, or is missing. Specific examples provided do not support the response, or is missing. Feedback:
List 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Be specific. Points: Points Range: 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided fully support the response provided. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided support the response provided. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response provided. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia, or is missing. Examples provided do not support the response provided, or is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points: Points Range: 5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback:
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
In 3 or 4 sentences, explain the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. Which drugs are contraindicated, if any, and why. Be specific. What it is the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms?–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent Point range: 90–100 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response accurately and clearly details which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. Good Point range: 80–89 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response accurately identifies which drugs are contraindicated with specific examples. The response accurately explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. Fair Point range: 70–79 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse. The response inaccurately or vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate or vague examples. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms. Poor Point range: 0–69 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appropriate drug therapy for a patient who presents with MDD and a history of alcohol abuse, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely identifies which drugs are contraindicated with inaccurate examples, or is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the timeframe that the patient should see resolution of symptoms, or is missing. Feedback:
List four predictors of late onset generalized anxiety disorder.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent Point range: 90–100 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. Good Point range: 80–89 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. Fair Point range: 70–79 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder. Poor Point range: 0–69 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists four predictors of late-onset generalized anxiety disorder, or is missing. Feedback:
List four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent Point range: 90–100 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Good Point range: 80–89 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Fair Point range: 70–79 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Poor Point range: 0–69 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists four potential neurobiology causes of psychotic major depression. Feedback:
An episode of major depression is defined as a period of time lasting at least 2 weeks. List at least five symptoms required for the episode to occur. Be specific.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent Point range: 90–100 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided fully support the response. Good Point range: 80–89 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided support the response. Fair Point range: 70–79 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur. Specific examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response. Poor Point range: 0–69 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains at least five symptoms for the episode of major depression to occur, or is missing. Specific examples provided do not support the response, or is missing. Feedback:
List 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Be specific.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent Point range: 90–100 12 (16%) – 13 (17.33%) The response accurately and clearly lists in detail 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided fully support the response provided. Good Point range: 80–89 11 (14.67%) – 11 (14.67%) The response accurately lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided support the response provided. Fair Point range: 70–79 10 (13.33%) – 10 (13.33%) The response inaccurately or vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia. Examples provided inaccurately or vaguely support the response provided. Poor Point range: 0–69 0 (0%) – 9 (12%) The response inaccurately and vaguely lists 3 classes of drugs, with a corresponding example for each class, that precipitate insomnia, or is missing. Examples provided do not support the response provided, or is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent Point range: 90–100 5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good Point range: 80–89 4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair Point range: 70–79 3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor Point range: 0–69 0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent Point range: 90–100 5 (6.67%) – 5 (6.67%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Good Point range: 80–89 4 (5.33%) – 4 (5.33%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. Fair Point range: 70–79 3.5 (4.67%) – 3.5 (4.67%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. Poor Point range: 0–69 0 (0%) – 2 (2.67%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback:
Total Points: 75
Name: NURS_6630_Week8_Assignment1_Rubric
