NUR 513 Review the evidence-based practice project ideas you described in Topic 5 DQ 1

NUR 513 Review the evidence-based practice project ideas you described in Topic 5 DQ 1

The nursing shortage is a serious issue facing the healthcare industry today. In order to address this issue, nursing schools must produce more qualified nurses. However, faculty shortages are a major obstacle to achieving this goal. Consequently, it is important to understand what types of scholarly nursing research would be required to solve this problem. Quantitative research is often used to measure the magnitude of a problem and to track changes over time. This type of research would be useful for understanding the scope of the faculty shortage in nursing schools. Finally, peer-reviewed resources would be essential for identifying effective solutions to the faculty shortage. By understanding what types of scholarly nursing research are needed, we can begin to develop strategies for solving this critical issue.

An article examined the nursing shortage from the perspective of employment opportunities, nurse educators, and students (Haddad, Annamaraju, & Toney-Butler, 2022). The authors use data from the National Sample Survey of Registered Nurses to analyze the nursing shortage in the United States. They also interviewed nurse educators and nursing students to gain insight into how the shortage is affecting those who are currently working in or studying to enter the nursing field. The findings of the study show that the nursing shortage is a real problem that is negatively impacting both nurses and those who are looking to become nurses.

It is important to select research that meets the CRAAP test for a number of reasons. First, research that is current and relevant is more likely to be accurate. This is because the methods and data used in the research are more likely to be up-to-date, and the findings are more likely to be applicable to real-world situations (Altamimi & Attamimi, 2014). Second, research from authoritative sources is more likely to be reliable. This is because sources that are considered authoritative have been vetted by experts in the field, and their findings are more likely to be trustworthy. Finally, research with a clear purpose is more likely to be useful. This is because research that is conducted with a specific goal in mind is more likely to produce results that can be applied in a practical way. In sum, selecting research that meets these criteria ensures that the research is of high quality and that it will be useful in addressing the needs of the reader. The article is relevant to the current situation in the United States, as the nursing shortage is a pressing issue that needs to be addressed. The authors are considered to be experts on the topic, as they are all registered nurses and have experience working in nursing education. The article is accurate, as it is based on data from a reputable peer reviewed source. The article’s purpose is to inform readers about the nursing shortage and to suggest ways to solve the problem.

References:

Altamimi, N., & Attamimi, R. (2014). Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning in Enhancing Speaking Skills and Attitudes towards Learning English. International Journal of Linguistics, 6, 27. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v6i4.6114

Haddad, L. M., Annamaraju, P., & Toney-Butler, T. J. (2022). Nursing shortage. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NUR 513 Review the evidence-based practice project ideas you described in Topic 5 DQ 1:

I am pleased so far with this first class in the master’s program. I am enjoying the online format more than I thought I would. I was afraid of it being mostly self-teaching without any connection with my classmates or instructor, but I haven’t found that to be the case. I am learning a lot of valuable information from both the content as well as my classmate’s responses. I have also been pleasantly surprised by how much the information we’re studying is already helping me in my current practice. Many of the topic questions are prompting me to think more deeply about current practice issues and giving me new insight. I’m slowly getting more comfortable with APA guidelines but still feel like it takes a lot of my focus and time.

One challenge that I’ve experienced is that my chosen field of study, healthcare quality and patient safety, doesn’t always lend itself easily to the discussion questions and feels a little bit like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole when answering questions. Perhaps this is because it is a less common specialty than most. On a positive note, this challenge is forcing me to think creatively about a problem which is something that I struggle with.

I’ve appreciated your openness to questions, Melanie, as well as your feedback.

Unread

The evidenced based practice that I mentioned in Topic 5 that is related to my current specialty is Fluid Management in Dialysis Patients. The types of scholarly research required to further investigate this issue would have to be both qualitative and quantitative research. The quantitative methodology uses investigation through statistics and mathematics and involves numerical data. Since results are numerical, they may not be influenced by personal feelings and opinions. Qualitative methodology, on the other hand, describes and translates concepts and phenomena rather than recording frequency. Therefore, the researcher is challenged to interpret the data and draw final conclusions based on observation. (Basias & Pollalis, 2018)

To be able to conduct more research on this issue, I will need both types of data. I chose one of the articles related to this topic. The title of the article is “Blood Pressure and Volume Management in Dialysis: conclusions from a kidney disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference”. This article was part of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) conference report in 2020. It recognizes that blood pressure and fluid control are critical components of dialysis care with substantial impact on symptoms, quality of life, and cardiovascular symptoms. (Flythe et al., 2020)

This article met all the criteria from the CRAAP test. It is current since it was published within the last 5 years. It is relevant since the topic is related to a research conducted on dialysis patients’ fluid management. The multiple authors, all of them listed in the article and all of them are affiliated with reputable institutions and experts in their field and the research was presented at an international conference for Nephrology. Information is accurate as it is verifiable from other scholarly sources, and lastly, the purpose of the study was to develop a global consensus of best practices in blood pressure and fluid management in dialysis patients. This article also included quantitative and qualitative data, multiple sources, and references of data. (New Jersey Institute of Technology, 2022)

References:

Basias, N., & Pollalis, Y. (2018). Quantitative and qualitative research in business & technology: Justifying a suitable research methodology. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, 91-105

Flythe, J. E., Chang, T. I., Gallagher, M. P., Lindley, E., Madero, M., Sarafidis, P. A., Unruh, M. L., Yee-Moon Wang, A., Weiner, D. E., Cheung, M., Jadoul, M., Winkelmayer, W. C., & Polkinghorne, K. R. (2020). Blood pressure and volume management: Conclusion from a kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney International, 97, 861-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.01.046

New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2022). How to evaluate information sources. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate

Based on my assignment on topic 5, the research method used in this research is quantitative research which is the dominant research framework in the social sciences. Quantitative analysis is a set of strategies, techniques, and assumptions used to study psychological, social, and economic processes by exploring numeric patterns (Wikipedia contributor,2022a).Quantitative research deals with a range of numeric data to investigate simple to highly sophisticated statistical analyses that combine the data to show relationships among the data or compare across aggregated data. (Wikipedia contributor,2022a). To further investigate this study, peer review studies should be performed. Peer review studies are the scholarly work of the author that is scrutinized by others who are considered experts in the same field, which is done to ensure academic scientific quality. The research article I used satisfies the CRAAP test based on the information.

RESEARCH STUDY

Fagundes Junior, A., Berg, D., Bohula, E., Baird-Zars, V., Guo, J., Katz, J., Alviar, C., Van Diepen, S., & Morrow, D. (2021). Palliative care in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs): Insights from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry. European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care, 10(Supplement_1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuab020.158

CRAAP TEST (Coghlan, Brydon-Miller, 2014, Wikipedia contributor,2022b)

1. Currency shows if the information is most recent, published or posted, revised or updated, and whether the research can rely on multiple sources in different McGuire platforms. It should also be accessible, and the links should be working.

Based on this definition, the study was published in 2021, within the five-year time frame for current research influencing cardiology practice in the ICU.

2. Relevance- the relevance of the information will impact a well-rounded research endeavor.

The research chosen is relevant to my current practice because it is about palliative care which is part of the treatment of a patient in cardiac ICU who is nearing or at the end-of-life stage.

3. Authority: The author, publisher, or sponsor is qualified to write about the topic because they are cardiologists who are expert in their fields and belong to the CCTN registry which is a network of tertiary care CICUs in the United States and Canada.

4. Accuracy- the evidence presented to support the information given to the audience, including findings, observations, or field notes, is reviewed or referred to.

The CCCTN Registry is a network of tertiary care CICUs in the United States and Canada. The study was conducted between 2017 to 2020. Twenty-six centers were included to contribute an annual 2-month snapshot of all consecutive admissions to the CICU. Code status, palliative care consultation rates, and decisions for comfort measures only before all deaths in the CICU were studied to conclude the topic presented.

5. Purpose- the sources should show the readers if the information is suitable for their research and the author’s intentions are clear.

The intentions were clear from the beginning because it is stated in the title, which is palliative care in cardiac intensive care units. Quantitative research has served its purpose because it collected and analyzed numerical data about the use of palliative care in the CICUs and whether there is room for improvement so patients can benefit from it before it is too late.

References:

Coghlan, D., Brydon-Miller, M. (2014). The SAGE encyclopedia of action research (Vols. 1-2). London, SAGE Publications Ltd doi: 10.4135/9781446294406

Wikipedia contributors. (2022a, August 20). Quantitative research. Wikipedia. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantitative_research

Wikipedia contributors. (2022b, October 7). CRAAP test. Wikipedia. Retrieved October 20, 2022, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

Fagundes Junior, A., Berg, D., Bohula, E., Baird-Zars, V., Guo, J., Katz, J., Alviar, C., Van Diepen, S., & Morrow, D. (2021). Palliative care in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs): Insights from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) registry. European Heart Journal. Acute Cardiovascular Care, 10(Supplement_1). https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuab020.158

Keeping up with innovative technology changes is one key challenge affecting nurse leaders. Technology continuously moves fast, and this affects nursing informatics and practice. A peer-reviewed qualitative study would be the most relevant article to address the topic. Opinions on innovations and challenges cannot be quantified; thus, a qualitative study would be the best. The article “Nursing Informatics Competency Assessment for the Nurse Leader” by Collins et al. (2017) is relevant and related to my evidence-based topic. All five CRAAP criteria were used to assess the article’s relevance. According to NJIT (n.d.), research needs to meet quality criteria to ensure that inferences and information presented are factual, not mere rumors. Authentic information is crucial in informing nursing practice and decisions made for better outcomes. Evaluating sources also ensures that no errors or mistakes that can damage lives and reputation

     The article meets the CRAAP criteria. First, the article is current since it was published within the past five years. This means that the information published is up to date. The article is also relevant to my topic. The authors conducted a study to assess nurse leaders’ informatics competencies. The finding outline significant gaps in informatics competencies associated with nurse leaders. Without these competencies, nurse leaders are unable to make the best decisions regarding technology innovations. The article also lists the author’s credentials (NJIT, n.d.). Besides, having been published in a reputable nursing journal, the authority is relevant. The article’s information is also accurate since results were gathered from several participants. The article also cites other authors’ work to support inferences. Finally, the article aims to inform its audience about the significance of nurse leader informatics competencies. 

References

Collins, S., Yen, P. Y., & Phillips, A. (2017). Nursing Informatics Competency Assessment for the Nurse Leader. information technology (IT), 6, 7.

New Jersey Institution of Technology (NJIT) (n.d.). How to Evaluate Information Sources. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP

The topic that I chose to discuss last week was the shortage of nurse educators. The main issues that I addressed in the discussion were budget issues and competition from other advanced nursing roles. Since my main concerns are focused on wage, I believe quantitative research will be the most helpful to investigate this issue. Additionally, peer-reviewed sources are necessary to prove accuracy of the source. The article that I have chosen to utilize is Job satisfaction and the factors affecting satisfaction in nurse educators: A systematic review. This article goes into detail on various topics in regard to job satisfaction for nurse educators: promotional opportunities, salary, conflict, empowerment, and experience (Arian et al., 2018).

The acronym “CRAAP” stands for currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. Currency indicates when the source was published and if it is outdated. Relevance is asking if the source meets the specific needs and requirements for your assignment. Authority is looking for who wrote the article and what the author does. Accuracy is asking if the information from the source is accurate and has been cited or verified by others. Purpose looks into a few different topics: purpose of article, intended audience, bias, and outside viewpoints (New Jersey Institute of Technology [NJIT], 2022). Utilizing this acronym when choosing articles is crucial. You always want to make sure that the information you are using is trusted and not outdated. Prior to this class, I have never heard of this acronym, and I will be using it for future research.

The source that I have chosen is from 2018. Since this is within the last five years, this is not outdated. The article goes into detail on different factors, such as salary, that impact the job satisfaction of nurse educators, so it is relevant to my topic of discussion. All three authors of this article, Mahdieh Arian, Mohsen Soleimani, and Mohammad Bagher Oghazian, work at Semnan University of Medical Sciences in Iran. Each of these authors are responsible for writing many peer-reviewed articles. This article has utilized and cited information from 74 scholarly articles. In addition, the article has been cited by at least 19 scholarly nursing journals and is peer-reviewed. The purpose of this article is to identify if nurse educators are satisfied with their jobs. The intended audience is individuals seeking employment as nurse educators. This article could have bias because all three authors work for the same institution. The article uses outside viewpoints from 74 scholarly sources which have been cited.

References

Arian, M., Soleimani, M., Oghazian, M.B. (2018). Job satisfaction and the factors affecting satisfaction in nurse educators: A systematic review. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(5), 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.07.004

New Jersey Institute of Technology. (2022, September 19). How to evaluate information sources. https://researchguides.njit.edu/evaluate/CRAAP