NURS 8002 Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
NURS 8002 Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

NURS 8002 Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

Week 5 Assignment 1: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

As a student pursuing further education in the field of nursing, it is imperative to develop skills that promote proficiency in research, that is, being able to locate sites with scholarly articles, read and carry out a critical analysis and evaluation. This is what will promote success in the field of nursing research and advancement in career as a credible scientist who can actively participate in the generation of new knowledge and skills that promote safer and efficient nursing practices. The databases available with scholarly work on nursing include; CINAHL Plus and PubMed (Medline) (Hopia & Heikkilä, 2019). The purpose of this paper is to identify two articles from the online nursing resources, write a summary of each article, synthesize the articles from a scholarly standpoint and discuss the difference between summarizing and synthesizing research articles.

The first article reviewed was on evidence-based practice, focusing on the knowledge, attitudes, implementation, facilitators, and barriers among community nurses (Li et al., 2019). This article focuses on the perception of the community nurses about the EBP projects and the barriers they face in carrying out such projects. The CNs have noted that the EBP projects have not been effective in their healthcare service delivery as they believe it is strongly associated with the advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) and they find their it difficult to relate it to their own practice. Additionally, it points out to the barriers the CNs face in successfully implementing their EBP projects. The barriers are majorly associated to limited time, resources, knowledge and training and poor motivation that does not encourage them to undertake such projects.

In my second article review, I read through the article on Evidence -based practice education for healthcare professionals: an expert review by Lehane et al., 2018.Accoording to the authors of the article, they do acknowledge the fact that even though EBP-projects are crucial to promoting patient’s safety and quality care, its implementation still remains a big challenge to most healthcare practitioners. There is need to constantly communicate to the evidences from research to the relevant stakeholders and more specifically healthcare educators which are better placed in articulating the EBP research process and importance. It is the role of nursing academicians and clinical educators to promote the expansion and successful implementation of EBP research findings into practice. This will ultimately result to quality care and updated methods of that are backed by research evidence and data (Lehane et al., 2018).

NURS 8002 Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

What steps do you take to locate primary and peer-reviewed research articles when performing a literature search?

What resources are available to you to engage in a meaningful and successful literature search?

Photo Credit: [erhui1979]/[Digital Vision Vectors]/Getty Images

As you have explored throughout this course, Walden University provides vast resources for student support to ensure success in their academic program of study. When it comes to research and using Library resources, several support mechanisms are available to you as well.

Taking the first step to think about a research topic or area of interest and filtering that topic using a series of keywords and operations will be a fundamental component for performing a literature search in Walden Library’s databases. While the ultimate goal is to produce a set or results that match your search criteria, you must keep in mind that that the quality of the research articles obtained will likely vary. Thus, you must critically examine and analyze the aims of the research produced and how it aligns, confirms, or negates your topic or area of research. As you develop proficiency in this area, you will discover that you can extract content themes and frameworks to enhance future research and the need to identify additional research support.

For this Assignment, consult the Walden Library webinars and resources provided. These resources serve as a general good first step for performing literature searches and engaging with the databases of research available to you. Think about a research topic or area of interest to focus on for this Assignment. Then, search the Walden Library to locate and retrieve peer-reviewed research articles that pertain to your topic or area of interest.

To prepare:

Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.
Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.

The Assignment: (6 paragraphs)

Write a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:

Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.
Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).
Write 1 paragraph that synthesizes the three articles using a scholarly voice.
Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

By Day 7 of Week 9

Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Module 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Module 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Module 4 Assignment Rubric

 

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Module 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

 

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9

To participate in this Assignment:

Module 4 Assignment

 

What’s Coming Up in Module 5?

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

In the next module, you will analyze ethical issues related to the role of the DNP-prepared nurse. You will also explore the role of the DNP-prepared nurse as an advocate for social change both within their professional practice area and their community.

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 5

 

Weeks 8–9: The Doctorally Prepared Nurse: Scholarship

One of the most important and critical roles of the DNP-prepared nurse is that of the scholar-practitioner. A scholar-practitioner represents an individual who is committed to not only ensuring effective, quality, and safe practice but engages in the necessary scholarship activities to inform that practice.

For example, consider the term evidence-based practice and how pervasive this type of research is for the field of nursing. So many aspects of advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery are rooted in evidence-based practice research (i.e., the installation and implementation of nursing practice/healthcare delivery guidelines that are supported by the critical analysis and synthesis of peer-reviewed research with clearly defined and specific test criteria).

In your role and function as a DNP-prepared nurse, you have the opportunity to not only demonstrate and apply advanced nursing practice but to also promote the future of advanced nursing practice further by informing the field and areas of improvement through sustained scholarship and research abilities.

This week, you will begin your critical analysis and synthesis of the peer-reviewed research on a topic of interest to inform advanced nursing practice. You will locate a set of peer-reviewed research articles to support your topic of interest and will engage in a stepwise approach to critically analyze, summarize, and synthesize themes in the current literature.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

Summarize peer-reviewed research
Synthesize peer-reviewed research
Contrast approaches for summarizing and synthesizing peer-reviewed research

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8002 Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

 

NURS 8002 Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

 

Shea, C. M., Jacobs, S. R., Esserman, D. A., Bruce, K., & Weiner, B. J. (2014).                Organizational readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implementation Science, 9(7), 1–15.

 

 

Walden University. (n.d.). Subject research: Nursing. Walden Library. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

Walden University. (n.d.). Using evidence: Synthesis. Writing Center. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence/synthesis

 

Westlake, C. (2012). Practical tips for literature synthesis. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 26(5), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0b013e318263d766

 

Document: DNP Project Process Guide (Word document)

 

Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

 

Review the following Media Resources available from the Walden Library:

Walden University. (n.d.). Library webinar archives: Nursing. Walden Library. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/nursing

“Introduction to Nursing Research in the Walden Library”
“Advanced Nursing Research Library Lab”

 

Module 4: The Doctoral Project and Project Management

Project management is the practice and underlying framework of initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing project work to achieve specific goals and meet specific success criteria within a given time frame. One of the primary challenges of project management is the need to achieve all the project goals within the given constraints.

The successful completion of your DNP program of study requires the completion of both a practicum/field experience and a Doctoral Project. Thus, the framework and practice of project management will be useful in ensuring that you can successfully complete the aims of these two major milestones of your degree program.

In this first course, you will not be required to select your official topic of interest for your Doctoral Project; however, it is highly encouraged that you begin thinking about the direction you might want to go in for the purposes of conducting an initial literature search on your topic of interest. Think about what practice area you might want to pursue upon completion of the DNP degree. What process or set of procedures in your current nursing practice require improvement or investigation? What type of quality improvement initiative are you interested in conducting to improve quality patient care and healthcare delivery?

What’s Happening This Module?

Module 4: The Doctoral Project and Project Management is a 2-week module—Weeks 8–9 of the course—in which you will conduct a literature search of peer-reviewed research and synthesize the research related to either your practice area or an area of particular interest for the practice of nursing. As you engage with the resources for this module, keep in mind that locating, critically analyzing, and synthesizing the peer-reviewed research will be an important skill to develop as you will engage in these processes to complete your Doctoral Project but also in advanced nursing practice. Consider the stepwise approach toward conducting a literature review in the Walden Library and how you will engage in a critical analysis and synthesis of your peer-reviewed research findings as you complete your Module Assignment.

What do I have to do? When do I have to do it?
Review your Learning Resources Days 1–7, Weeks 8 and 9
Assignment: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9.

Go to the Week’s Content

Week 8-9

 Rubric Detail

 

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric

Grid View
List View
  Excellent

90%–100%

Good

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Poor

0%–69%

Write a 1-paragraph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and clearly introduces in detail how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including a detailed description of the literature search process and the databases consulted.

The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the introduction and process described.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an accurate description of the literature search process and the databases consulted.

The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the introduction and process described.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate or vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted.

The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the introduction and process described.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate and vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted, or it is missing.

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the introduction and process describes, or it is missing.

Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs). 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail each of the articles selected.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately summarizes each of the articles selected.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected.

OR

The response summarizes < 3 articles. 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing. Write 1 paragraph that synthesizes the 3 articles using a scholarly voice. 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response comprehensively and fully synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately and clearly support in detail the practice area or area of interest selected. 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately supports the practice area or area of interest selected. 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely synthesizes content from the articles selected that may lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected. 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely synthesizes content from the 3 articles selected that does not lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected, or it is missing. Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples. 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the differences explained. 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the differences explained. 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the differences explained. 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the differences explained, or it is missing. Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric   Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50 Use the following coupon code : SAVE15 Order Now

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ONLINE NURSING PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
 ordernowcc-blue