NURS 6050 Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template SAMPLE

NURS 6050 Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis  Template SAMPLE

NURS 6050 Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template SAMPLE
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template
The purpose of this assignment is to highlight the significance of policy analysis or evaluation in provision of successful health care delivery. Successful policies and programs require developers to consider different aspects of evaluation from their initial point. Policy or program evaluation informs
NURS 6050 Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Analysis Template SAMPLE
stakeholders about the impact it has had since its implementation and what can be done to enhance its effectiveness to different health populations. The paper evaluates the Affordable Care Act 2010 based using this template.

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Affordable Care Act 2010 Policy

The aim of the policy is to increase the number of individuals covered by medical insurance. The policy also aims at improving the quality of medical care and costs.

How was the success of the program or policy measured?
The success of the policy is measures using health insurance companies and effects on the number of individuals with health insurance. These firms reported an increase in enrollment based on estimated projections by the policy (Courtemanche et al., 2018). For instance, the rate of uninsured individuals dropped by close to 20% since the policy’s enactment.

How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
Over 20 million people that were never insured got covered through the Affordable Care Act. These include individuals with pre-existing conditions (Sommers et al., 2017). The uninsured levels fell in all levels of income, households, level of education and among the various ethnic groups. The issue of paying bills was resolved as more people who did not visit healthcare providers dropped with more accessing care interventions.

What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
The enactment of ACA policy was based on the declining rates of employer-based insurance coverage and an increase in the number of individuals without medical insurance. For instance, the level of uninsured nonelderly individuals was a concern as soon as their parents’ coverage stopped due to high cost of insurance premiums.

What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?
The insured will have limited access to healthcare providers and get sub-standard service since only a small number of providers will accept lower rates than those in the private market. Healthy young adults were mandated to buy extensive policies without any need due to subsidies for the uninsured. The plan leaves limited options for the participants and discourages entry of new players as they cannot dictate prices which reduces competitiveness.

What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
The involved stakeholder in policy evaluation included state and federal government and agencies, health insurance firms, political leaders, the Supreme court and the public.
The main beneficiaries of the policy include young adults since the premiums were reduced to allow them purchase insurance coverage (Milstead & Short, 2019). Irrespective of the ethnic group, income or education level, everyone would benefit from the policy upon enrollment due to the lower rates of premium.

Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
The Affordable Care Act 2010 met its original intent and objectives since the number of uninsured individuals and households dropped significantly. The policy subsidized insurance premium rates. Insurance companies reported improved enrollment rates while hospitals recorded a rise in the number of visits by patients covered for different health care needs (Sommers et al., 2017). The policy’s ability to increase health insurance markets and options is considered as a fundamental part of its effectiveness and attaining intended objectives.

Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
Yes, I would highly recommend the policy in my workplace because of the benefits that it offers to employees and even employers. The policy promotes health through subsidized insurance premiums that allow individuals with pre-existing conditions to enroll and get medical care. The policy promotes primary care interventions as individuals can access healthcare services for reviews and screening (Courtemanche et al., 2018). The policy also demonstrates the need for state and federal governments to understand the importance of health insurance coverage in reducing the cost of healthcare.

Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.
As a nurse advocate, evaluation of the policy is essential, especially its outcomes and impacts on the targeted populations. In this case, the policy had intended and unintended consequences and its evaluation is important in informing better interventions to address the negative effects. Through the evaluation, one makes a comparison on outcomes and anticipated results to ascertain the difference (Laureate Education, 2018). Secondly, evaluation of cost and benefit is essential as it demonstrates the overall economic viability and sustainability of the policy, particularly in the long-term (Williams & Anderson, 2018). Cost-benefit analysis and cost-effectiveness studies cane be critical in understanding the effects of the policy.

General Notes/Comments
The enactment of the ACA 2010 remains a historic and landmark decision that transformed healthcare forever and ensured that more Americans could access better health interventions. The positive effects of ACA 2010 are critical for cost-reduction efforts and quality of care. Conversely, the act has unintended effects like reduced competitiveness of the healthcare environment. However, the policy remains a critical part of enhancing quality care and affordable health in the country.

Courtemanche, C., Marton, J., Ukert, B., Yelowitz, A., & Zapata, D. (2018). Effects of the Affordable Care Act on health
care access and self-assessed health after 3 years. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 55, 0046958018796361.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Importance of Program Evaluation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett
Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393.
Sommers, B. D., Maylone, B., Blendon, R. J., Orav, E. J., & Epstein, A. M. (2017). Three-year impacts of the Affordable Care Act:
improved medical care and health among low-income adults. Health Affairs, 36(6), 1119-1128.

Order Now