NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Essay
NURS 6003 Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Research Analysis
NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Essay
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.
Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Essay
In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.
To Prepare:
Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research. NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Essay
Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article
NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Essay
focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.
Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.
The Assignment:
Using the “Module 3 | Part 3” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
Your topic of interest.
A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template
Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following: NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Essay
Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.
Module 3 | Part 3: Research Analysis
I have identified one topic of interest for further study. I have researched and identified one peer-reviewed research article focused on this topic and have analyzed this article. The results of these efforts are shared below.
Directions: Complete Step 1 by using the table and subsequent space below identify and analyze the research article you have selected. Complete Step 2 by summarizing in 2-3 paragraphs the results of your analysis using the space identified.
Step 1: Research Analysis
Complete the table below
Topic of Interest:
Research Article: Include full citation in APA format, as well as link or search details (such as DOI)
Professional Practice Use:
One or more professional practice uses of the theories/concepts presented in the article
Research Analysis Matrix
Add more rows if necessary
Strengths of the Research Limitations of the Research Relevancy to Topic of Interest Notes
Step 2: Summary of Analysis
Craft a summary (2-3 paragraph) below that includes the following:
Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research
Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research
Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research
Week 4 | Part 4: Research Analysis
Nursing students doing their Master of Science in Nursing (MSN) program should understand the healthcare environment and issues that impact care delivery like the emergence of infectious diseases as the case of the current Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) pandemic. The emergence of this condition has had profound effects on mental health for many individuals because of the restrictions of social movements and need to adjust to a different way of doing things (Muller et al., 2020). In this part, I highlight my topic of interest, which is the mental effects of Covid-19 and identify and discuss a peer-reviewed article on this topic. The second part offers a summary of my analysis based on certain questions.
Step 1: Research Analysis
Complete the table below
Topic of Interest: Effects of Covid-19 on Mental Health on Healthcare Workers
Research Article: Include full citation in APA format, as well as link or search details (such as DOI) Muller, R. A. E., Stensland, R. S. Ø., & van de Velde, R. S. (2020). The
mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review. Psychiatry research, 113441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113441
Professional Practice Use:
One or more professional practice uses of the theories/concepts presented in the article
The need to understand the mental effects of the Coronavirus disease pandemic is critical in appreciating efforts by providers to know how to handle patients and their families due to measures like isolation. One of the theories or concepts presented in the article is the need to have effective psychotherapeutic approaches to help healthcare workers deal with the pandemic as it has disproportionate effects on their health and wellbeing due to increased exposure to the disease. The authors are categorical that while psychotherapeutic interventions are essential, healthcare workers require occupational protection, enough rest and social support.
The concepts presented in the article demonstrate the need to protect physicians and other health care providers in getting interventions that mitigate the adverse effects of Covid-19 on their mental health (Muller et al., 2020). Practitioners can develop effective ways to offer support to health care workers struggling with the mental effects of the pandemic with the aim of inspiring and motivating them to understand
Research Analysis Matrix
Add more rows if necessary
Strengths of the Research Limitations of the Research Relevancy to Topic of Interest Notes
The study demonstrates the effects of Covid-19 on healthcare workers and the need to protect them from increased exposure.
The study uses systematic literature review which does not consider current views from healthcare workers affected by the pandemic. The study is relevant to the topic as it addresses the critical mental issues that health care providers experience as they try their best to offer care to Covid-19 patients. The research findings in the study are essential in understanding the underlying causes of mental health issues among health care workers during this pandemic.
The study shows that healthcare workers; mental health issues are associated with organization factors such as workload and exposure to Covid-19 patients
The study uses a methodology that is weak with low scores in the AMSTAR The findings of this research forms the basis of different interventions based on evidence from multiple areas and specialties to enhance mental health for healthcare providers. The study demonstrates the importance of having different interventions at various moments for organizations and providers.
The study uses systematic review approach based on protocols and validity.
The study requires effective analysis and use of evidence in specific areas when handling Covid-19 mental health issues for nurses and other healthcare providers.
The inclusion criteria employed by the study shows the need for researchers to go in depth to produce systematic reviews based on their topic of interests.
The need to understand the type of mental health care interventions in the study shows that it is does not address the salient aspects that lead to problems in care settings
Step 2: Summary of Analysis
The analysis of a peer-reviewed journal article is important in knowing issues that form the basis of one’s research. The implication is that one must have critical thinking abilities and use relevant analytical models associated with the study area or topic. Using these aspects, I focused on understanding the most important matters impacting healthcare providers during this pandemic. The study shows that despite their efforts as front line care providers in the fight against Covid-19, health care providers or workers bear the brunt of the pandemic and are disproportionately affected by its negative effects (Javed et al., 2020). They are more susceptible due to the nature of their work.
I employed different strategies to find a peer-review research article for the topic and other future studies that I will undertake in the MSN program. The first strategy in this case was the application of the right search words in different database to get the article. Secondly, finding peer-reviewed journals on the relevant issue enables one to get the best articles, particularly from primary research works. One can also employ various resources to access peer-reviewed research studies (Bhatt & Priya, 2018). Among these resources is Walden online library with journal databases from different areas and specialties. These include databases like Medline, Cochrane library and CINAHL plus among others.
Conclusion
Research analysis is an important part of the MSN program and nurse student should utilize the chance to improve their critical thinking abilities and analytical skills. The emergence of Covid-19 and its implications for healthcare workers’ mental health are critical issues that need research and application of better interventions to reduce the effects of the disease on the delivery system.
References
Bhatt, J. D. O. & Priya, B. J. D. (2018). Ensuring Access to Quality Health Care in
Vulnerable Communities. Academic Medicine, 93(9):1271-1275. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002254
Javed, B., Sarwer, A., Soto, E. B., & Mashwani, Z. U. R. (2020). The coronavirus
(COVID‐19) pandemic’s impact on mental health. The International journal of health planning and management, 35(5), 993-996. 10.1002/hpm.3008
Muller, R. A. E., Stensland, R. S. Ø., & van de Velde, R. S. (2020). The
mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review. Psychiatry research, 113441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113441
By Day 7 of Week 5
Submit your analysis, including your completed section of the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template sections and your matrix and summary.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “Wk5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 5 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5
To submit your Assignment:
Week 5 Assignment
Next Module
To go to the next module:
Module 4
Module 3 (Weeks 4–5): Scholarship and Nursing Practice
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Your Toolbox for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
Analyze research databases for identifying peer-reviewed articles
Analyze peer-reviewed research
Justify the use of peer-reviewed research in professional practice
Analyze strategies for finding peer-reviewed research
Due By
Assignment
Week 4, Days 1–4
Read the Learning Resources.
Begin to compose Part 3 of your Assignment.
Week 4, Days 1–2
Read the Learning Resources.
Compose your initial Discussion post.
Week 4, Day 3
Deadline to post your initial Discussion post.
Begin to compose Part 3 of your Assignment.
Week 4, Days 4–5
Review peer Discussion posts.
Compose your peer Discussion responses. (Make sure to participate in the Discussion on three different days.)
Continue to compose Part 3 of your Assignment.
Week 4, Day 6
Last day to post Discussion responses.
Week 5, Days 1–6
Continue to compose Part 3 of your Assignment.
Week 5, Day 7
Deadline to submit Part 3 of your Assignment.
Learning Resources
Required Readings
Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical appraisal of clinical research. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942
Shellenbarger, T. (2016). Simplifying synthesis. Nurse Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from http://naepub.com/reporting-research/2016-26-3-3/
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals
Walden University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentals
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/home
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Common assignments: Synthesizing your sources. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview/synthesizing
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly
Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Webinars: Technical information. Retrieved November 14, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical
Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)
Document: Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for success (PDF)
Required Media
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Discussion: Using the Walden Library
Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.
To Prepare:
Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.
By Day 3 of Week 4
Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
By Day 6 of Week 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 4 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 4
To participate in this Discussion:
Week 4 Discussion
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Using the Module 3 Part 3 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
· The topic of interest you have selected.
· Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
· Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected.
The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.
The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected.
The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.
The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected.
The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.
The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing.
Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
· Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.
Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.
Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.
The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.
Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
· Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
· Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
· Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
Points Range: 41 (41%) – 45 (45%)
The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.
Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the summary provided.
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 31 (31%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing.
The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research, or is missing.
The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. NURS 6003 Part 3 Research Analysis Essay
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6003_Module03_Week05_Assignment_Rubric
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code :
SAVE15
Order Now
