NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison

Nursing Practice Problem:

The proposed nursing practice problem is the lack of proper nursing education on Covid-19 vaccination. This nursing practice issue is selected because several studies reported that many people showed hesitancy to go for Covid-19 vaccines due to a lack of proper education on the essence of the vaccines in addressing the pandemic

Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison:

Criteria	Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: Berry, S. D., Goldfeld, K. S., McConeghy, K., Gifford, D., Davidson, H. E., Han, L., … & Mor, V. (2022). Evaluating the findings of the IMPACT-C randomized clinical trial to improve COVID-19 vaccine coverage in skilled nursing facilities. JAMA Internal Medicine, 182(3), 324-331. Doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8067 Translational Research Type: T4	Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link: Lockyer, B., Islam, S., Rahman, A., Dickerson, J., Pickett, K., Sheldon, T., … & Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid‐19 Scientific Advisory Group. (2021). Understanding COVID‐19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Health Expectations, 24(4), 1158-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13240 Traditional Qualitative Research Type: Phenomenological study type	Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology	This was a randomized controlled trial where a total of 7496 residents and 17963 staff of skilled nursing facilities were recruited. The intervention used was a multi-component approach with education regarding vaccination as the pillar.	This was a qualitative study conducted in the UK, where a total of 20 participants were involved. The study used in-depth phone interviews to interview individuals from different ethnic groups. A reflective thematic analysis was then conducted.	While the translational research used a randomized controlled trial and education at the center multi-component approach, qualitative research used in-depth interviews.
Goals	The main goal of this study was to find out if a multi-component vaccine education and campaign would increase COVID-19 vaccination rates among residents and staff in skilled nursing facilities.	The main goal of this study was to understand people’s COVID-19 beliefs, attitudes, and their interaction with information and misinformation during the COVID 19	Both research studies focused on issues surrounding vaccine uptake.
Data Collection	Data were mainly collected or obtained from the resident’s electronic medical record using the PointClick Care platform. Such data included vaccination status, minimum data set assessments, codes from the status or admission updates, and census data.	The data was collected through in-depth phone interviews and transcripts obtained from the recorded interviews.	While the translational research used electronic medical records as the major strategy for data collection, the qualitative research used in-depth phone interviews.

Comparison 2: Translational Research vs. Quantitative Research

Criteria	Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: Zolotarova, T., Dussault, C., Park, H., Varsaneux, O., Basta, N. E., Watson, L., … & Kronfli, N. (2023). Education increases COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people in Canadian federal prisons in a prospective randomized controlled trial: The EDUCATE study. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.040 Translational Research Type: T4	Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link: Li, P. C., Theis, S. R., Kelly, D., Ocampo, T., Berglund, A., Morgan, D., … & Burtson, K. (2022). Impact of an education intervention on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a military base population. Military Medicine, 187(Special Issue_13), e1516-e1522. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab363 Traditional Quantitative Research Type: Correlational research type	Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology	This was a randomized controlled trial where patients who were unwilling to be vaccinated were randomized into two groups; an intervention group that received education and a control group.	This was a correlational study where a curriculum for vaccine hesitancy consisting of a PowerPoint presentation and a question-and-answer session was conducted. The educational content involved the effects of COVID-19, information on the vaccines, and common concerns or myths surrounding vaccines.	The translational research used an EDUCATE program as the major intervention, while the quantitative research used a PowerPoint presentation to deliver an educational program to the participants.
Goals	The purpose of this research was to evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine.	The major goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of educational programs on the hesitancy of taking the COVID-19 vaccine and reduce the rates of vaccine hesitancy.	Both research studies focused on determining the impact of educational intervention on COVID-19 uptake and vaccine hesitancy.
Data Collection	The data for this research was achieved by two self-administered paper questionnaires.	Data were mainly collected through a post-seminar questionnaire using SurveyMonkey. The questionnaire items were age, occupation, concerns before the seminar (and if they had been addressed), post-seminar opinion of the vaccine, the plan regarding COVID-19 vaccination, degree of trust in health care professionals, helpfulness of the seminar, and whether or not they would recommend the vaccine to others.	Both research studies used questionnaires to collect data, even though the questionnaires were formatted differently.

References

Berry, S. D., Goldfeld, K. S., McConeghy, K., Gifford, D., Davidson, H. E., Han, L., … & Mor, V. (2022). Evaluating the findings of the IMPACT-C randomized clinical trial to improve COVID-19 vaccine coverage in skilled nursing facilities. JAMA Internal Medicine, 182(3), 324-331. Doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.8067

Lockyer, B., Islam, S., Rahman, A., Dickerson, J., Pickett, K., Sheldon, T., … & Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid‐19 Scientific Advisory Group. (2021). Understanding COVID‐19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK. Health Expectations, 24(4), 1158-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13240

Li, P. C., Theis, S. R., Kelly, D., Ocampo, T., Berglund, A., Morgan, D., … & Burtson, K. (2022). Impact of an education intervention on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a military base population. Military Medicine, 187(Special Issue_13), e1516-e1522. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab363

Zolotarova, T., Dussault, C., Park, H., Varsaneux, O., Basta, N. E., Watson, L., … & Kronfli, N. (2023). Education increases COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people in Canadian federal prisons in a prospective randomized controlled trial: The EDUCATE study. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.040

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ONLINE NURSING PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT