Explain whether cognitive behavioral therapy would be effective with this group.

Required Readings Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Chapter 11, In the Beginning (pp. 309344) Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2005). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. Chapter 12, The Advanced Group (pp. 345390) American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Bjornsson, A. S., Bidwell, L. C., Brosse, A. L., Carey, G., Hauser, M., Mackiewicz Seghete, K. L., Craighead, W. E. (2011). Cognitive-behavioral group therapy versus group psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder among college students: A randomized controlled trial. Depression and Anxiety, 28(11), 10341042. doi:10.1002/da.20877 Safak, Y., Karadere, M. E., Ozdel, K., Ozcan, T., Trkapar, M. H., Kuru, E., & Ycens, B. (2014). The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral group psychotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 25(4), 225233. Retrieved from https://www.turkpsikiyatri.com/ Select two clients you observed or counseled this week during a group therapy session. Note: The two clients you select must have attended the same group session. Then, in your Practicum Journal, address the following: Describe each client (without violating HIPAA regulations), and identify any pertinent history or medical information, including prescribed medications. Using the DSM-5, explain and justify your diagnosis for each client. Explain whether cognitive behavioral therapy would be effective with this group. Include expected outcomes based on this therapeutic approach. Explain any legal and/or ethical implications related to counseling each client. Support your approach with evidence-based literature. _Rubric Grid View List View Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assignned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points Range: 26 (26.00%) – 30 (30.00%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 25 (25.00%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points Range: 4 (4.00%) – 5 (5.00%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%) No purpose statement was provided. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts. Points Range: 8 (8.00%) – 10 (10.00%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 7 (7.00%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. Points Range: 16 (16.00%) – 20 (20.00%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 15 (15.00%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. Points Range: 16 (16.00%) – 20 (20.00%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 15 (15.00%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 4 (4.00%) – 5 (5.00%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 3 (3.00%) – 5 (5.00%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 2 (2.00%) Contains many (? 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 3 (3.00%) – 5 (5.00%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 2 (2.00%) Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. Hide