DeVry nr 361: Week 1 discussion AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results
DeVry nr 361: Week 1 discussion AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results
Download and open the AACN Essentials Self-Assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Complete the self-assessment of your current comfort levels and total your score. If you are willing, please share your total score with your classmates in your discussion post. Identify areas where your knowledge could use improvement. Keep in mind that all professional nurses are knowledge workers. What questions do you have as they relate to nursing informatics and the AACN essentials?
Criteria for Content
- Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
- Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
- Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
- Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
- Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
- Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
- When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
- Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
Discussion Questions (DQ)
• Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
• Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
• One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
• I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
• Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
• In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DeVry nr 361: Week 1 discussion AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results
DeVry nr 361: Week 1 discussion AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results
• Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
• Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
• Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
• Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
• I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
• I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
• As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
• It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
• For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
• Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
• Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
• Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
• The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
• Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
• If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
• I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
• As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
• Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
o Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
o Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Criteria for Content
- Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
- Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
- Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
- Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
- Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
- Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
- When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
- Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
NR 451 Week 1 Graded Discussion Topic: OurCare Culture
NR 451 Week 1 Graded Discussion topic is “Our Care Culture.” The online lesson is provided by Chamberlain College of Nursing, a DeVry Education Group institution. This discussion topic addresses the differences between evidence-based practice, research, and quality improvement projects. Students must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time on Wednesday. During the week, students can start posting no earlier than Sunday before the discussion.
This course focuses on differences in research, evidence-based practice, and quality improvement projects. The NR-451 Week 1 Graded Discussion Topic Our Care Cultural focuses on a research article by Small, D.S., published in 2011. Using this resource as a guide, students can develop their own quality improvement project to incorporate evidence-based practices into their practice. This is a valuable exercise in examining different approaches to care.
The discussion question is related to the course outcome. It should address the importance of a patient’s or family’s perspective in nursing care. EBP should take into account patient and family preferences. If a practice is inconsistent with the preferences of patients or families, the nurse must be aware of this and make changes to accommodate them. The nurse must ensure that their practice is based on evidence-based practice.
NR 451 Week 1 Discussion Related iCARE SelfAssessment form
For the NR 451 Week 1 Discussion Related quiz, use the iCARE SelfAssessment. The self-assessment is not graded, but it is meant to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructors. To help you with this, you can also review the NR 451 SelfAssessment for the course. It will provide you with an overall understanding of the course content and the skills you will need to be successful.
The iCARE SelfAssessment includes an introduction to the subject matter of the lecture. The article must be a scholarly source and cite it properly. It should also include citations, references, and paraphrasing. Students should follow a template for the iCARE paper. This tutorial is available here. If you do not have one, download it and use it.
The iCARE SelfAssessment requires a thorough reading of the articles describing the concept of interprofessional teamwork. You can use a CINAHL database to search for topics of interest. For example, you can search for the term iCARE, but this will not give you the results you need for your assignment. Rather, you can search by topic or term. Make sure to use the headings on the iCARE SelfAssessment.
NR 451 Week 2 Graded Discussion Topic: -Communicationand Influence-the Power of Evidence
NR 451 Week 2 Graded Discussion topic: “Communication and Influence-the Powe” is one of the major components of nursing. In this course, you will learn how to communicate effectively to promote patient outcomes and promote a culture of caring in healthcare. In this discussion, you will explore the role of effective communication and influence in the healthcare setting and how these skills can contribute to improving patient outcomes.
To engage in meaningful discussion, choose a course outcome-related discussion topic that relates to the course outcome and encourages participation from your classmates. Responding to more than one post is encouraged. Ensure that you select a different classmates each week and choose a different one. Nurses must be able to manage evidence and information and influence the behaviors of others to improve patient outcomes.
NR 451 Week 3 Assignment: Healthcare Policy
The NR 451 Week 3 Assignment will require you to evaluate the effects of new federal health legislation on nursing practice. This assignment is a PowerPoint presentation. You will use bullet points to help you educate your peers on various bills. Here is a list of federal health bills that are currently in the works. The purpose of this assignment is to allow students to meet the course outcomes, integrate clinical judgment, and develop their professional role as communicators and leaders. The NR 451 Week 2 Assignment is a good example of this.
You will have two weeks to complete your Discussion. For Week 3, your discussion is due on Monday. For Week 8, it is due on Wednesday at 11:59 PM MT. For the final grade, you must post three times in each graded discussion. If you begin posting before Sunday, your posts must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time on the previous Monday. For the last three weeks, the discussions are due on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.
NR 451 Week 3 Graded Discussion Topic: -Resilience and Change
NR 451 Week 3 Graded Discussion: Resilience and Change is a survey course that focuses on social justice, sustainability, and human well-being. The course will introduce students to the role of the interprofessional team in improving patient outcomes. They will examine iCARE and its components. They will also discuss the importance of integrating these teams into the healthcare system.
NR 451 Week 4 Graded Discussion Topic: -Advocacy and Cultural Competence
This graded discussion topic addresses cultural competency and advocacy. It is an important learning experience in an online classroom. It requires active participation and student posts must be submitted two (2) times per graded thread. The first post must be posted no earlier than 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Students may begin posting as early as the Sunday before each week. The graded discussion thread will close at 11:59 p.m. PT on Wednesday.
This category is designed to help students develop a deeper understanding of diversity in today’s world. It is a minimum of three hours in length, focusing on the role of diversity in contemporary societies. The global societies category examines patterns of cultural, political, and social behavior across cultures. This course lays the foundation for responsible world citizenship. This category is also a prerequisite for the course.
NR 451 Week 5 Assignment: iCare Paper
The iCARE Paper assignment explores the concept of patient outcomes and interprofessional teams. The paper explores the role of the nurse in a collaborative environment and how her supportive actions can contribute to the patient’s care. The iCARE Paper is due on the Sunday, end of Week 5 at 11:59 p.m. MT. The essay is due in APA format.
In the iCARE Paper assignment, you will research the concept of interprofessional teams and how nursing can contribute to patient outcomes. You will discuss the role of iCARE components in a healthcare setting, as well as the impact of interprofessional teams on patient outcomes. Also, make sure to address the presence of an interprofessional team in the patient’s care. You can use the CINAHL database to search for articles related to this topic.
The iCARE Paper assignment requires you to apply your knowledge of interprofessional teams to the concept of patient outcomes. This assignment will include a summary of the three iCARE components and their influence on the culture and outcomes of the patient. Moreover, you will also have to demonstrate your ability to collaborate with other professionals in a multidisciplinary team. Using this assignment can help you meet the course objectives.
NR 451 Week 5 Graded Discussion Topic: -Interprofessional Collaboration
For this course, students will respond to the graded discussion topic “Interprofessional Collaboration.” The graded discussion question will be based on a pre-determined rubric. The purpose of the graded discussion is to promote interprofessional collaboration throughout patient transitions. If you need help, visit the NR 451 website for more information. For more information, please visit the NR451 Learning Management System.
The graded discussion will be a critical learning experience in an online classroom. As such, it is essential that students participate in all discussions, including the ones that involve the concept of interprofessional collaboration. In addition, they must post at least three times in each discussion, on two different days. They must also respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 PM MT on Wednesday. The assignment is due the following Monday, but they must be submitted by the end of the course.
The topic for this week’s graded discussion is “Interprofessional Collaboration,” and it is worth 200 points. It’s due on the Sunday, May 26, at 11:59 PM, MT. In the assignment, students should reflect on their current work environment, recent clinical setting, and the concept of interprofessional teamwork. They should also choose a scholarly nursing article from CINAHL that discusses the concept of interprofessional teamwork.
NR 451 Week 6 Assignment: Evidence BasedPractice Change Process
As part of the NR 451 Week 6 Assignment, you will develop a systematic review focusing on the evidence-based practice change process. The systematic review will examine the practice issue and how it can be changed to improve the care given by the healthcare team. The change process will include the role of the team, stakeholders, and the research project. After you have developed a model, you will discuss the scope of the problem, the role of the study’s statistical analysis, and the logical steps to take to address the situation.
The Nurse Daniel assignment, worth 225 points, is a simulation. The task requires you to develop a lesson plan based on the ACE Star Model and systematic review. You must complete the simulation before submitting your written assignment. Before completing the activity, refer to the tutorial and transcript to determine what you need to do to be successful in this step. You should identify a clinical topic, locate a systematic review, and write your own nursing actions.
In the last step, the student should evaluate the change process by examining the evidence-based practice of a physician. You should examine the data to find the root causes of a practice problem and implement changes accordingly. In addition, you must consider the effect on the patient’s quality of life and the costs. After you have assessed the risks and benefits of the changes, you should determine how effective the new practice is.
NR 451 Week 6 Graded Discussion Topic: -TransformationalLeadership
In NR 451, week six of the course, students are tasked with addressing a Graded Discussion Topic about transformational leadership. The graded topic is related to the Course Outcome, CO2, and the TEACH value. In the course, students develop their skills in fostering and sustaining transformational leadership within a workplace. The goal of the discussion is to help students learn about this critical leadership skill.
Throughout the semester, students are expected to participate in online discussions, which will be graded based on quality and relevance. These threaded discussions will cover specific chapters of the textbook. In addition, the course requires the students to take two online quizzes, one for each week. The quizzes will be administered using ExamGuard. The quizzes will consist of ten multiple-choice questions, and students should be prepared by reviewing the course materials.
NR 451 Week 6 Graded Discussion: The next step is to watch a film that presents a specific approach to leadership. Students will then critically evaluate the film’s portrayal of leadership. They will incorporate information from Northouse (2016), compare and contrast the approach with other leadership approaches. Afterward, students should reflect on what they have learned from the film. As a final step, students will reference their texts and sources using APA or MLA publication style.
NR 451 week 7 Graded Discussion Topic: -CDCwonder
You will learn about innovative technology in nursing from the CDC Wonder site. Its resources for nurses include telehealth and patient monitoring. In your response, you will discuss how you would implement the resources in your practice. Consider implementing telehealth to improve patient care. Also, think about innovative aspects of the link. Using this resource will allow you to share your ideas and innovations with the nursing community.
The discussion is a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation is required. For each graded discussion, students must post at least three times on two different days. They must respond to the initial question of the discussion by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. The final grade for Discussion is based on the number of responses received from all students. If you are unsure of the deadline for your first post, feel free to reach out to your professor.
NR 451 Week 8 Graded Discussion Topic: -YourNursing Destiny.
The NR 451 Week Eight Graded Discussion Topic Your Nursing Destiny relates to the Course Outcome. The assignment asks you to explain how you plan to continue your professional development. You might consider joining professional nurse organizations to stay up-to-date. You might also think about obtaining certification in order to better serve the healthcare field. You can also share your plans to help others in their career path.
The first task in the NR 451 Week 8 Graded Discussion is to document a practice issue. You can use a systematic review to determine whether the topic is important or not. You can also use the ACE Star model to identify the issue and suggest an appropriate intervention. This will help you develop a clear and concise argument for your argument. Once you’ve completed your research, you’ll be ready to write your individualized response to the initial discussion question.
NR 451 Week 8 Graded Discussion topic Your Nursing Destiny should include research, practice issues, and clinical case studies. During the grading period, you should prepare to answer questions about the assignment. The grading period for this graded discussion topic is four weeks. In addition, you should make sure you have sufficient time for the assignment. You should submit your work to Dropbox before the end of the third week of the course.
