Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model

Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model LDR 615
Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model
Research the various change models used by organizations today. After assessing these models, create a change model conducive to your field, and that will work within your organization’s culture. This model
Benchmark – Change Initiative Develop a Change Model LDR 615 Essays
should serve to implement a strategic process that can help your organization integrate a change and respond to the internal or external driving forces that affect organizational success.
Create a visual representation of your model using a graphic organizer of your choice (flow chart, concept map, etc.). The design of your model will be unique and relevant to your organization, based on a critical analysis of its culture and behavior. However, your model must demonstrate the necessary steps for realistic implementation. Your model will be assessed on the quality of strategic implementation you design, the support you present for your model, and inclusion of the following concepts:

Methods to evaluate the need for change
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative
Communication strategies
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and overcome resistance
Implementation strategies
Sustainability strategies

Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER!!! Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model
Once you have created your model, prepare a 15-20 slide PowerPoint presentation to present your model and demonstrate how this model is relevant to your organization and why it will work well within your organization’s culture. In conclusion, discuss why this model will lead to sustainable change when most change initiatives fail. You will utilize this change model for your final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Due Date: 09-Oct-2019 
Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model

´In the nursing practices, change models are essential in introducing changes to the medical practices both at the individual and group level.
´Change models often have three major concepts which includes restraining forces, driving forces, as well as the equilibrium.
´The driving forces refers to the factors that push the approaches in the direction that enhances the occurrence of changes.

In the medical surgical-floor the application of change models is essential in understanding the approaches that are needed to enhance various surgical processes. In other words, floor nursing and leadership requires the adoption of change models that are effective and in line with the needs of the medical professionals and the patients involved in the process. In most cases, to facilitate the application of change models, it is always necessary to push patients in the desired direction, thereby causing shift of equilibrium towards change processes. The restraining forces refers to the factors that often counter the driving forces; they often hinder the treatment processes since they tend to push patients approaches in the opposite direction.

Resources
Collapse All

The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations

Read the Introduction and Chapter/Step 5 in The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations
… Read More

View Resource

Transformational Change

Read, “Transformational Change,” by Hannon, from Training Journal (2014).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2004-18411-009&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Integrating Organizational Change Management and Customer Relationship Management in a Casino

Read “Integrating Organizational Change Management and Customer Relationship Management in a Casino,” by Chi Cong Mai, Perry, and
… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=100270149&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Evaluating the Success of Strategic Change Against Kotter’s Eight Steps

Read “Evaluating the Success of Strategic Change Against Kotter’s Eight Steps,” by Spencer and Winn, from Planning for Higher
… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ofs&AN=507948373&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Team-Building and Change Management in Respiratory Care: Description of a Process and Outcomes

Read “Team-Building and Change Management in Respiratory Care: Description of a Process and Outcomes,” by Stoller et al., from
… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105031465&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Navigating Change

Read “Navigating Change,” by Bisoux, from BizEd (2015).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=100345843&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Mastering the Art of Change

Read “Mastering the Art of Change,” by Blanchard, from Training Journal (2010).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=47573877&site=ehost-live&scope=site

The Meaning and Measurement of Implementation Climate

Read “The Meaning and Measurement of Implementation Climate,” by Weiner et al., from Implementation Science (2011).
… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.or

Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model – Rubric
Collapse All

Evaluate the Need for Change
11 points

Criteria Description

Evaluate the Need for Change

5. Excellent
11 points

Methods used to evaluate the need for change are extremely thorough and include extensive explanation and numerous supporting details.

4. Good
9.57 points

Methods used to evaluate the need for change are complete and include explanation and supporting details.

3. Satisfactory
8.69 points

Methods used to evaluate the need for change are included but lack explanation and supporting details.

2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points

Methods used to evaluate the need for change are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

Methods used to evaluate the need for change are not included.

Choosing Individuals or Teams for Change Initiative (B)
11 points

Criteria Description

Choosing Individuals or Teams for Change Initiative Analyze organizational behavior to determine systemic interdependencies among individuals, teams, and departments. (C 3.1, 6.1)

5. Excellent
11 points

Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are expertly crafted.

4. Good
9.57 points

Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are complete and clearly explained.

3. Satisfactory
8.69 points

Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are included but lack clear explanation.

2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points

Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are not included.

Communication Strategies
11 points

Criteria Description

Communication Strategies

5. Excellent
11 points

Communication strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.

4. Good
9.57 points

Communication strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.

3. Satisfactory
8.69 points

Communication strategies are included but are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.

2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points

Communication strategies are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

Communication strategies are not included.

Stakeholder Support and Overcoming Resistance
11 points

Criteria Description

Stakeholder Support and Overcoming Resistance

5. Excellent
11 points

Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are expertly crafted.

4. Good
9.57 points

Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are complete and clearly explained.

3. Satisfactory
8.69 points

Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are included but lack clear explanation. Benchmark – Change Initiative Develop a Change Model LDR 615 Essays

2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points

Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are not included.

Implementation Strategies
11 points

Criteria Description

Implementation Strategies

5. Excellent
11 points

Implementation strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior. Benchmark – Change Initiative Develop a Change Model LDR 615 Essays

4. Good
9.57 points

Implementation strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.

3. Satisfactory
8.69 points

Implementation strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.

2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points

Implementation strategies are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

Implementation strategies are not included.

Sustainability Strategies
11 points

Criteria Description

Sustainability Strategies

5. Excellent
11 points

Sustainability strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.

4. Good
9.57 points

Sustainability strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.

3. Satisfactory
8.69 points

Sustainability strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.

2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points

Sustainability strategies are incomplete or incorrect.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

Sustainability strategies are not included.

Graphic Organizer: Visual Appeal and Clarity of Change Model
5.5 points

Criteria Description

Graphic Organizer: Visual Appeal and Clarity of Change Model

5. Excellent
5.5 points

The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that clearly illustrates the change model. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently. Benchmark – Change Initiative Develop a Change Model LDR 615 Essays

4. Good
4.79 points

The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that illustrates the change model. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships of the change model. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.

3. Satisfactory
4.35 points

The change model is presented using a graphic organizer, but the design does not clearly illustrate the intended change model. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout of the graphic design used.

2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points

The change model is presented using a graphic organizer. Presentation of change model uses garish color or the typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited within the chosen design. Benchmark – Change Initiative Develop a Change Model LDR 615 Essays

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

The change model is not presented using a graphic organizer.

Presentation of Content on PowerPoint
11 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content on PowerPoint

5. Excellent
11 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating rationale and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good
9.57 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included.

3. Satisfactory
8.69 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Little persuasive information is included. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

PowerPoint Layout
5.5 points

Criteria Description

PowerPoint Layout

5. Excellent
5.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good
4.79 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. Benchmark – Change Initiative Develop a Change Model LDR 615 Essays

3. Satisfactory
4.35 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. Benchmark – Change Initiative Develop a Change Model LDR 615 Essays

Research
11 points

Criteria Description

Research

5. Excellent
11 points

Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Strong support and rationale is presented for the change model.

4. Good
9.57 points

Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Adequate support and rationale is presented for the change model.

3. Satisfactory
8.69 points

Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. General support and rationale is presented for the change model.

2. Less than Satisfactory
8.14 points

Few outside sources were used to support the change model. Limited research is apparent to provide support or rationale for the change model.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

No outside sources were used to support the change model.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
5.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

5. Excellent
5.5 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good
4.79 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory
4.35 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources
5.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent
5.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good
4.79 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory
4.35 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory
4.07 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory
0 points

Sources are not documented.

Rubric
Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model – Rubric
No of Criteria: 12 Achievement Levels: 5
Criteria
Achievement Levels
Description
Percentage
Unsatisfactory
0.00 %
Less than Satisfactory
74.00 %
Satisfactory
79.00 %
Good
87.00 %
Excellent
100.00 %
Content
Evaluate the Need for Change
10.0
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are not included.
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are incomplete or incorrect.
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are included but lack explanation and supporting details.
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are complete and include explanation and supporting details.
Methods used to evaluate the need for change are extremely thorough and include extensive explanation and numerous supporting details.
Choosing Individuals or Teams for Change Initiative
10.0
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are not included.
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are incomplete or incorrect.
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are included but lack clear explanation.
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are complete and clearly explained.
Approach and criteria for choosing individuals or teams necessary for a change initiative are expertly crafted.
Communication Strategies
10.0
Communication strategies are not included.
Communication strategies are incomplete or incorrect.
Communication strategies are included but are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.
Communication strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.
Communication strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
Stakeholder Support and Overcoming Resistance
10.0
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are not included.
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are incomplete or incorrect.
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are included but lack clear explanation.
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are complete and clearly explained.
Strategies to gather stakeholder support and over come resistance are expertly crafted.
Implementation Strategies
10.0
Implementation strategies are not included.
Implementation strategies are incomplete or incorrect.
Implementation strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.
Implementation strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.
Implementation strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
Sustainability Strategies
10.0
Sustainability strategies are not included.
Sustainability strategies are incomplete or incorrect.
Sustainability strategies are inconsistent with the organizational culture and behavior and/or lack detail and explanation.
Sustainability strategies are completely detailed and explained and consistent with the organizational culture and behavior.
Sustainability strategies are extremely detailed and well explained and align seamlessly with the organizational culture and behavior.
Graphic Organizer: Visual Appeal and Clarity of Change Model
5.0
The change model is not presented using a graphic organizer.
The change model is presented using a graphic organizer. Presentation of change model uses garish color or the typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited within the chosen design.
The change model is presented using a graphic organizer, but the design does not clearly illustrate the intended change model. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout of the graphic design used.
The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that illustrates the change model. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships of the change model. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
The change model is presented using a graphic organizer that clearly illustrates the change model. Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
Presentation of Content on PowerPoint
10.0
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Little persuasive information is included. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating rationale and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
PowerPoint Layout
5.0
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Research
10.0
No outside sources were used to support the change model.
Few outside sources were used to support the change model. Limited research is apparent to provide support or rationale for the change model.
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. General support and rationale is presented for the change model.
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Adequate support and rationale is presented for the change model.
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Strong support and rationale is presented for the change model.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
5.0
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Benchmark – Change Initiative: Develop a Change Model
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

 
LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: 

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

 
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 50
Use the following coupon code : SAVE15

Order Now

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ONLINE NURSING PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
 ordernowcc-blue