Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program
NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program
Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program
Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation
Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about
NURS 6050 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation
program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.
Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.
To Prepare:
· Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
· Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
· Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.
The Assignment: (2–3 pages)
Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:
· Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
· How was the success of the program or policy measured?
· How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
· How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
· At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
· What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
· What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
· What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
· Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
· Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
· Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation
Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template
The evaluation of a policy is an important aspect that will address its effectiveness in regards to addressing the intended objectives. The role of the nurses in conducting this evaluation is paramount based on their expertise and advocacy credentials. One of the foremost policies that has received a lot of attention is the Affordable Care Act. At its inception, the policy was designed to increase the reach of healthcare services to a large portion of the populace. The purpose of the present paper is therefore to assess the effectiveness of the ACA in the above regard by analyzing various aspects such as its success and reach among others.
| Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation |
Affordable Care Policy/Affordable Care Act |
| Description |
Affordable care policy was enacted in the year 2010 to reduce the cost of healthcare system. In other words, the Affordable Care Act was enacted to provide affordable insurance coverage to millions of Americans who were uninsured. Affordable care polity expanded Medicaid eligibility, created market insurance market place, stopped or prevented health insurance companies from limiting or denying insurance coverage to the pre-existing conditions (Chen et al., 2018). The plan also expanded the coverage for health benefits to essential health benefits. With the affordable health insurance, lower-income families qualified for subsidies for the coverage purchased the marketplace. The introduction of the Affordable Care Act has altered the processes of healthcare provision across different countries and within the United States of America. The Affordable care act has exposed the employers to a new set of challenges across the medical spectrum and on the other hand, it has brought numerous opportunities. In the recent times, the medical costs have skyrocketed and in the recent times, the medical insurers account for more compensation for workers.
|
| How was the success of the program or policy measured?
|
The success of Affordable Care Policy was measured through the number of insurance coverage. After the implementation of the policy, millions of poor Americans were insured. Majority of Americans were able to get quality healthcare services at cheaper costs. The success of Affordable Care policy was also measured through the improvement in quality healthcare services (Milstead & Short, 2019). The implementation of the policy involved billions of money, the main objective of allocating such money was to enhance the quality of services delivered through introduction of research processes and evidence-based practices. Also, the policy enhance training of healthcare professionals to acquire knowledge for managing some of the emerging diseases. The success of the policy can therefore be measured through the improvement in quality services in different hospitals and health centers.
|
| How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
|
The policy impacted millions of people across the United States. Affordable Care policy impacted about 61 million women across the United State. In other words, 61 million women were able to access contraception without any out-of-pocket costs. The expansion of Medicaid was associated with the 19,200 fewer deaths among older low-income adults from the year 2013 to the year 2017 (Glied & Jackson, 2017). Also, the policy led to the 15, 600 preventable deaths across the United States of America. The policy led to the significant reduction in the number of mortalities associated with different complications.
|
| At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
|
The policy evaluation was conducted at the legislation stage. There were several legislation processes to verify some of the aspects of the policy. There was evaluation in terms of the budgeting process, the costs of medication, as well as the impacts on the political, social, and economic environment. |
| What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
|
Healthcare data from different institutions were used to inform different aspects of the policy. The data applied were drawn from different organizations including Center for Disease Control and infection, World Health Organization as well as the data from the Federal and states department of health. |
| What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?
|
Some of the unintended consequences of the policy include poor legislation and opposition from different political divide. Also, the political activities are some of the unintended consequences of the policy. While developing the policy, some of the political factors were not put into consideration.
|
| What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
|
Some of the stakeholders include healthcare consumers, healthcare providers, federal government, state government, as well as employers. Healthcare consumers include citizens and all other beneficiaries of healthcare services. Also, legislators are key part of the Affordable Care Policy. Some of the people that will benefit most include consumers who would experiences a significant reduction in the healthcare costs. Also, political actors will be able to benefit from the healthcare policy (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2017).
|
| Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
|
The policy met the original intent and objectives. Millions of Americans experienced significant reduction in the healthcare costs. In other words, all people from different social-economic status were to receive quality and less costly healthcare services as intended. Also, there was a general improvement in the quality healthcare services delivered to patients (In Powers, 2020). Today, millions of Americans continue to enjoy cheap/affordable and quality healthcare services to patients and all the citizens.
|
| Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
|
I would recommend implementing this policy in my workplace. One of the main objectives of my organization is to improve the quality of healthcare services. Also, the organization aims at ensuring the delivery of affordable healthcare services to different members of the community. Affordable Care Policy can therefore be implemented to meet the above objectives.
|
| Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.
|
As a nurse advocate, I would get involved in evaluating the provision of training for the healthcare professionals as well as the benefits anticipated from the increased activities such as research processes. In other words, I would get involved in the evaluation of key benefits and well as roles of healthcare professionals as stipulated in the policy.
|
| General Notes/Comments |
The implementation of Affordable Care Policy involved different stakeholders skilled or with experience in different areas of practice in the healthcare systems. Also, with effective planning at every step, the government managed to implement different aspects of the policy without significant interference from other institutions. The policy met the original intent and objectives. Millions of Americans experienced significant reduction in the healthcare costs. In other words, all people from different social-economic status were to receive quality and less costly healthcare services as intended.
|
Conclusion
The ACA was intended to ensure that the quality and affordability of healthcare services in the United States were improved. The analysis revealed that it largely achieved its original objective based on the number of people who are ensured in the aftermath of its inception. Nurses have an important advocacy role to play in the success of the program.
References
Chen, J., Vargas-Bustamante, A., Mortensen, K., & Ortega, A. N. (2018). Racial and ethnic disparities in health care access and utilization under the Affordable Care Act. Medical care, 54(2), 140. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4711386/
Glied, S., & Jackson, A. (2017). The future of the Affordable Care Act and insurance coverage. American journal of public health, 107(4), 538-540. Retrieved from: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303665
In Powers, J. S. (2020). Healthcare Changes and the Affordable Care Act: A Physician Call to Action.
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (2017). The Cost of ACA Repeal. https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2016/06/the-cost-of-aca-repeal.html
NURS 6050 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Required Readings
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 7, “Health Policy and Social Program Evaluation” (pp. 116–124 only)
Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Shiramizu, B., Shambaugh, V., Petrovich, H., Seto, T. B., Ho, T., Mokuau, N., & Hedges, J. R. (2016). Leading by success: Impact of a clinical and translational research infrastructure program to address health inequities. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 983–991. doi:10.1007/s40615-016-0302-4
Williams, J. K., & Anderson, C. M. (2018). Omics research ethics considerations. Nursing Outlook, 66(4), 386–393. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2018.05.003
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
- Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
- Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
- One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
- I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
- Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
- In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
- Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
- Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
- Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
- Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
- I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
- I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
- As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
- It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
- For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
- Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
- Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
- Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
- The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
- Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
- If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
- I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
- As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
- Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
- Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
- Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
NURS 6050 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Policy Evaluation Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Program/Policy Evaluation
Based on the program or policy evaluation you seelcted, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:
· Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
· How was the success of the program or policy measured?
· How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
· At what point in time in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
Response clearly and accurately describes in detail the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
Response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the success of the program or policy was measured.
Response clearly and accurately describes in detail how many people were reached by the program or policy and fully describes the impact of the program or policy.
Response clearly and accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
Response accurately describes the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
Response accurately explains how the success of the program or policy was measured.
Response accurately describes how many people were reached by the program or policy and accurately describes the impact of the program or policy.
Response accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.
Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete.
Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete.
Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the impact is vague or inaccurate.
Response vaguely describes the point at which the program or policy evaluation was conducted.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.
Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing.
Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the associated impacts is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Response of the point at which time the program or policy was conducted is missing.
Reporting of Program/Policy Evaluations
· What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
· What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
· What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit the most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
· Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
· Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
· Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Response clearly and accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.
Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation.
Response clearly and accurately explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation.
Response clearly and accurately explains in detail who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation.
Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.
Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Response accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.
Response explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation.
Response explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation.
Response explains who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation.
Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.
Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation.
Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague or incomplete.
Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate.
Explanation of whether the program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete or inaccurate.
Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete or inaccurate.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Identification of the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unitended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague and incomplete, or is missing.
Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Explanation of whether the program or policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reas
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH ONLINE NURSING PAPERS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT